[ovs-dev] [PATCH] tunneling: Reduce priority of multicast tunnels.

[Ben Pfaff]

On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:32:45PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> It's possible to have an incoming packet that matches both a unicast
> and multicast tunnel if the source address corresponds to the remote_ip
> of a unicast tunnel and the destination is multicast.  Currently this
> will match the multicast tunnel but in reality the unicast tunnel
> should probably be considered more specific.  This is actually a
> common situation in protocols that use a combination of multicast
> for flooding and unicast for responses.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <jesse at nicira.com>

Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com>

Should we have separate key_* counters for multicast tunnels?