[ovs-dev] [PATCH] debian: Use a different way to avoid failing install without kernel module.

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Fri Mar 16 15:57:47 PDT 2012


On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:49:13PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 07:16:04AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 02:19:31PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:30:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:49:08PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > > > > This looks fine to me, I don't know much about debian though.  If you
> > > > > feel confident in it I'm fine with merging it.  Otherwise someone else
> > > > > should look at it.
> > > > 
> > > > I am happy with this change.
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> > > 
> > > Thank you.  I pushed this to master.
> > > 
> > > Simon, I haven't backported this or the previous series of Debian
> > > changes to 1.4.  Do you want me to do that?
> > 
> > How far away do you think 1.5 is?
> > Personally, I think that if its more than a few weeks away then I think
> > that fixing up the Debian packaging in 1.4 would be worthwhile.
> 
> I'll do the backport.
> 
> I'm not sure whether Debian should upgrade to 1.5 when it comes out
> anyway.  OVS 1.4 is a branch that we are planning to support for an
> extended period of time.  If wheezy freezes in June, then 1.4 will be
> the last such release before the freeze.

Understood, in that case I agree that backporting makes sense.



More information about the dev mailing list